Website Analysis
Politico.com, the online version of the Politico newspaper, is largely concerned with politics, through both elections and policy work. The site is mostly devoted to politics on a national level, focusing on the presidency, Congress, and lobbying in Washington. Additionally, the site features an opinion area and community section, where readers can create and contribute to forums on issues of national politics. A video section exists, as well as a section titled “Politico Click,” an area devoted to political gossip. The site often creates special sections devoted to specific topics. For example, politico.com recently created, “2012 Live,” a section specializing in the upcoming presidential election in 2012.
“Pawlenty hits Obama on Egypt response”
This news article, written by James Hohmann of Politico, outlines potential presidential candidate Tim Pawlenty’s criticism of the slow response to the Egypt crisis by the Obama Administration. Using a hard news approach, Hohmann states the main purpose of the article in his first sentence, and continues to give the location of Pawlenty when he was speaking and a more detailed description of who he is in the second paragraph. This is followed by quotes beginning in the second paragraph and continuing throughout the story. These quotes, which back up the title and initial paragraph of the article, were received from MinnPost.com. Pawlenty specifically criticizes Obama’s slow approach to the issue with Egypt, citing his recent State of the Union address, in which he hardly spoke of foreign policy, as evidence of his shortcomings. Additionally, Pawlenty goes on to describe his own credentials in foreign policy, discussing recent trips to Iraq and Afghanistan, as well as his recent hire of a former Bush assistant on foreign policy. The article concludes with a quote from Pawlenty that he made in a recent radio interview in Des Moines, Iowa, a recent stop on his book tour. In the quote, the theme of criticism against the Obama Administration’s approach to foreign policy continues.
In the article, Hohmann’s hard news approach seems to be the most effective. He clearly states the purpose of the article in very few words in his first paragraph, and backs up his information with direct quotes from Pawlenty. His approach is clean and concise, and his decision to wrap the article with a strong ending quote proves effective. Hohmann is also effective in subtly inserting his opinion into the article. He describes Pawlenty as an “all-but-declared presidential candidate,” and writes that Pawlenty is often eager to add his own personal experience in the Middle East. These additions, though they contain some evidence, are presented as being subjective to the author’s opinion. For example, another writer may not emphasize how “eager” Pawlenty seems to be to discuss his experience in the Middle East. Overall, however, Hohmann writes with little to no bias or opinion in the rest of his article.
http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0111/48524.html
“Mitt’s in the money”
In the article titled “Mitt’s in the money,” writer Kasie Hunt of Politico outlines Mitt Romney’s financial position as he enters into 2011, and compares him to two other top possible presidential competitors, Sarah Palin and John Thune. Hunt writes that Romney currently has approximately $1.4 million of cash on hand after raising $6.3 million last year, trailed by Sarah Palin, who currently has $1.3 million and raised $4.5 million in 2010. Thune, however, has over $7 million of cash on hand after facing no opposition in his recent Senate reelection. Though no source is attributed in the article, several sources revealing financial information of Romney’s political action committee were used, potentially from the Federal Election Commission or another government agency. The article goes on to discuss the sources of Romney’s cash flow, and contributes this money to several state-based PACs of Romney’s. In closing, the article describes where Romney’s money seems to be going: other candidates and conservative causes. Additionally, it provides a breakdown of the sources of his money, with federal accounts having slightly more money than state-based PACs.
Hunt’s article maintains its basis on statistics throughout, including numbers and dollar amounts in every paragraph used in the article. The article is straight to the point, and provides no analysis of the numbers or any sort of expert opinion on what the numbers may mean. Although the title, “Mitt’s in the Money,” is vague and almost demands a subtitle or preview of the article, Hunt’s first sentence quickly states her point: potential candidate Romney currently has more money than almost any other contender in the presidential race. Hunt’s use of details to provide the origin of the money proves helpful in giving readers a look at where the former governor may be campaigning the most, where his base may be, and where he may be looking to open headquarters if he decides to declare his candidacy.
http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0111/48512.html